Join the IMPACT coaches for a deep dive on a new topic every month in our free virtual event series.

Register Here
Close

Join the IMPACT coaches for a deep dive on a new topic every month in our free virtual event series.
Register Here
The Ultimate Inbound Marketing Strategy Playbook 2022

Take your inbound strategy to the next level

  • Master the 7 principles of highly effective inbound marketing
  • Dramatically improve your inbound sales
  • Get more buy-in at your company

New Senate Bill Targets Tech's "Addictive" Tactics To Gain Engagement

By Iris Hearn

New Senate Bill Targets Tech's "Addictive" Tactics To Gain Engagement

For years, marketers have implemented psychological tactics in marketing campaigns to influence users to take desired actions. 

 Join the IMPACT coaches for a deep dive on a new topic every month in our free virtual event series.

However, in our “always-connected” culture where people are constantly engaging with internet content, there’s been a blurred line between innocent marketing and manipulation. 

With standard marketing tactics, brands are competing for sales. However, the game is slightly changed with social media apps — now, they’re competing for your attention. Since these platforms make the majority of their revenue from advertising sales, these companies have an increased incentive to employ tactics that keep users on their platform for longer periods of time. 

So much so that the government is taking notice. 

Now, tech companies are using well-researched psychological tactics in the UX to create apps and and websites that are purpose-built to essentially create an “addiction” for their users. 

At least, that’s what Missouri Senator Josh Hawley believes. Hawley recently sponsored the Social Media Addiction Reduction Technology (SMART) Act, a bill that is intended to ban “addictive” features purposefully designed to keep people on platforms longer. 

According to Hawley, the SMART bill aims to: 

“Prohibit social media companies from using practices that exploit human psychology or brain physiology to substantially impede freedom of choice, to require social media companies to take measures to mitigate the risks of internet addiction and psychological exploitation, and for other purposes.”

What’s in the SMART Act? 

Hawley’s SMART Act seeks to ban the following tactics apps and platforms utilize to influence engagement:

  • Infinite scroll or auto-refill 
  • Elimination of natural stopping points 
  • Auto-play (with the exception of pre-made playlists or music streaming purposes) 
  • Badges and other rewards linked to engagement with the platform

I think most of us can relate to the moment when you click on one Facebook video, and after scrolling for a while, you realize much more time has passed than you had thought. 

Because Facebook will automatically scroll to the next video and block your smartphone’s clock from appearing, it’s easy to get lost in hours of video content. This is made even more powerful by Facebook’s advanced algorithm that keeps tabs on what you’re watching to provide recommendations you’d be interested in. 

While I do understand that Facebook is doing this to intentionally keep users on the platform longer and why that can be seen as problematic, I’m not going to lie — I really do enjoy the infinite scroll feature, and if it were to go away it's unlikely I'd watch the same amount of video content on the platform. 

Beyond Facebook’s auto-scroll, the bill would ban another popular social media feature — Snapstreaks.

If you’re not aware, Snapchat has a feature called Snapstreaks that indicates how many times you and another person have “Snapchatted” each other in a row. For each milestone, you get a new emoji tacked onto your Snapchat friendship. 

I don’t personally use it, but some people are really invested in it and have ongoing Snapstreaks dating back years

But, according to the SMART Act, this feature would be seen as a “badge or reward” for continuous engagement to the platform — meaning that users will return more often than they otherwise would for that reward. 

How will the SMART bill affect marketers? 

The SMART bill is similar to another Senate bill banning websites from utilizing “Dark Patterns” to manipulate users. Overall, because people now spend so much time on the internet, it should be unlawful to intentionally mislead or manipulate users. 

Still, if this bill passes (it's too early to tell the likelihood), it could set a precedent that would certainly shake up the industry, for better or for worse. 

As it stands already, platforms are constantly competing with one another to get more engagement time and repeat visits. For marketers, you want to advertise on the platform where people are spending longer amounts of time to increase the chances of reaching your audience. 

This increased engagement also allows advertisers to charge more for ads, as more traffic means more views, clicks, and impressions.

If that all goes away, it will be interesting to see how engagement time is affected, and if ad performance drops as a result. 

Beyond advertisement purposes, I think there’s a point to be made about the role of social media and internet-connected apps in our modern lives — and that they may have a larger effect on our behavior than we realize. 

Putting restrictions in place like this may force marketers to re-evaluate their advertising strategy, and also force them to turn to their own website or apps' UX and see if they’re employing similar tactics. 

Engagement is great, but earned engagement is better — and it soon may be required by law to eliminate any attempts to sway user behavior in this way. 

Join the IMPACT coaches for a deep dive on a new topic every month in our free virtual event series.

Topics:

News
Published on August 13, 2019

Recent Articles

INBOUND 2021 Recap: Takeaways, Speakers, and Lessons Learned
October 25, 2021 • 7 min read
Drift report on pandemic fallout reveals seismic shift in marketing strategy
September 9, 2021 • 3 min read
Google Shares New Tools to Audit Website User Experience
August 12, 2021 • 3 min read
Google: Website Content Quality More Important Than Quantity
August 10, 2021 • 3 min read
New HubSpot CMS Hub Starter Tier Released for Growing Businesses
August 6, 2021 • 4 min read
Why most marketing 'news' doesn't matter to inbound marketers
August 3, 2021 • 4 min read
Gartner: Slashed 2021 marketing budgets increases in-house ownership
July 30, 2021 • 6 min read
How to Optimize Videos On Your Business Website for Search
July 23, 2021 • 4 min read
Data: 'Funny' seniors imagery is not only demeaning, it's inaccurate
July 21, 2021 • 4 min read
Google: 'Here's how to prepare for the future private web'
July 16, 2021 • 4 min read
How Facebook's news feed algorithm works and prioritizes content
July 14, 2021 • 4 min read
Too many internal links in content can confuse Google about site structure
July 9, 2021 • 5 min read
Data: Facebook is No. 1 in revenue value for publishers, Twitter is a bust
July 7, 2021 • 4 min read
Google July 2021 core update rolling out over next 2 weeks
July 2, 2021 • 4 min read
Google punts third-party cookie ban to 2023 for 'responsible planning'
June 25, 2021 • 6 min read
Finally, Google page experience core update is rolling out
June 18, 2021 • 3 min read
Apple Mail privacy news spooks email marketers, newsletter creators
June 16, 2021 • 4 min read
Google June 2021 core update live, July core update coming
June 4, 2021 • 3 min read
You can boost LinkedIn posts and promote events, marketers
May 28, 2021 • 3 min read
Google's June page experience core update will be mobile first, then desktop
May 21, 2021 • 3 min read
Best times to post on social media in 2021 (new data)
May 19, 2021 • 4 min read
Deeper content engagement is up on desktop (new pandemic data)
May 7, 2021 • 4 min read
Google confirms demise of Q&A search feature, Question Hub lives on
April 26, 2021 • 1 min read
What is the new HubSpot Operations Hub?
April 23, 2021 • 2 min read
Big Google algorithm update moved to June with new performance report
April 21, 2021 • 4 min read